![]() They could not afford to ignore those in states that are currently not competitive.Ĭalifornia, Colorado, Connecticut, DC, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington have joined the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. They would have to work to earn the votes of citizens all over the country. Candidates would not be able to focus on just a few states and a few issues like they do now. If the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact passes, candidates would have to pay attention to all issues that matter to all voters. This would mean that the presidential candidate who earns the most total votes from citizens across the country would be elected President. If enacted, it would give all of each participating state’s Electoral College votes to the candidate who wins the nationwide popular vote. It will go into effect when it passes in states representing at least 270 Electoral College votes. It is an agreement that has already been passed in 15 states and DC, which together represent 195 Electoral College votes. ![]() It would ensure that the winner of the national popular vote would be elected President. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an effort to make every eligible citizen’s vote matter in every presidential election. Where you live should not determine the importance of your vote in presidential general elections. If you don’t, your vote - although still important and necessary - has less of an impact. If you happen to live in a swing state, your vote is very important. Under the Electoral College, the importance of your vote in presidential general elections depends on where you live. The states - and their voters - that get ignored are big and small, Democratic and Republican, urban, suburban, and rural. As a result, presidential candidates focus their attention and energy on only a few states. The presidential general election votes are incredibly important in competitive, or “swing,” states, but not as important in other states, because all the electors will likely go to one candidate even if another wins a significant number of votes. The current system focuses candidates’ attention on just a few states. This has happened five times in United States history. It is possible to become President while earning fewer votes from citizens around the country than a rival candidate. The Electoral College system means that the candidate who earns the most votes does not always win. ![]() What are the problems with the Electoral College? Each political party and state has its own process and procedures for determining who those electors are. Each state and the District of Columbia is allocated a different number of electors based on its population. Maine and Nebraska use systems that allow multiple candidates to win electors within each state.Ī candidate must receive the votes of 270 electors to win. Most states use a “winner-take-all” system, in which they award all of their Electoral College votes to the winner of the popular vote in that state. The popular vote in presidential elections helps determine how each state’s electors will vote. Instead, the 538 electors in the Electoral College vote to determine the President and Vice President. Voters do not directly elect the President and Vice President of the United States. ![]() The Electoral College is the way people in the United States elect the President and Vice President. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |